The Treasury Department's Office of Payment Integrity (OPI) deployed Artificial Intelligence(AI)-based fraud detection at the onset of Fiscal Year 2023, resulting in the recovery of over $375 ...
The IRS announced that compliance efforts around erroneous Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims have topped more than $1 billion within six months. "We are encouraged by the results so fa...
The IRS has announced the federal income tax treatment of certain lead service line replacement programs for residential property owners. It is required by the federal and many state governmen...
The IRS has released guidance to help taxpayers understand what to do with Form 1099-K. Responding to feedback from taxpayers, tax professionals and payment processors, the agency had announced b...
The IRS has provided a waiver for any individual who failed to meet the foreign earned income or deduction eligibility requirements of Code Sec. 911(d)(1) because adverse conditions in a f...
The Colorado Department of Revenue has adopted the following new individual income tax rules:Rule 39-22-104(3)(d), relating to the addback for state income taxes deducted in determining federal taxabl...
IMPORTANT NOTICE: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MAKES TAX CREDITS AVAILABLE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS and Not-for-Profits THROUGH ELECTIVE PAY
On June 14, 2023, the inflation Reduction Act was modified to allow local governments and not for profits to receive tax credit refunds even though they are not required to pay income taxes. Under the new elective pay rules a government may qualify for a refund for one of the following activities:
- Clean Vehicle Credits. If your government purchased a plug-in electric vehicle that draws significant propulsion from an electric motor, you may be eligible for a maximum credit of $7,500 for qualified vehicles with gross vehicle weight of under 14,000 pounds and $40,000 for all other vehicles. This includes passenger vehicles, buses, and ambulances.
- Charging infrastructure. If your government expended funds for charging infrastructure on your property, you may qualify for a refundable tax credit.
- Solar, geothermal or wind generation projects that have been completed in 2023 or are going to be completed by year end. This can include solar panels on government owned buildings.
These credits are likely available regardless of whether Federal or State Grants were utilized for their purchase or construction. The IRS has just finished accepting input on the proposed preliminary rules and final regulations are not anticipated to be completed until later this year. HOWEVER, in order to retain the ability to claim credits you will need to:
I. Complete a pre-filing registration with the IRS. It is anticipated that the portal for registration will be available later this year.
II. File form 990-T or related extension by May 15th, 2024. This will entitle you to receive the credit which can be wired directly to your account.
The rules, documentation and filings can be complex; however, your government will be entitled to a refund if they meet the required criteria. If you believe you may qualify for a credit based upon the items noted above, or anticipate completing projects in 2024 that may qualify, please contact us directly. Additional information can be found here: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p5817e.pdf and here: https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/elective-pay-and-transferability-frequently-asked-questions-elective-pay as well as attached.
NEW Federal Green Tax Refundable Credits now available for Local Governments and Not-for-Profits: Eligible Tax Credits
Implementation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019
Implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 87, “Leases” (“GASB 87") is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
Financial Reporting for Pension Plans - an amendment of GASB 25
Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions - an amendment of GASB 27
The Regional CPA Firm: Your Trusted Business Adviser
Regional CPA firms are great business advisers to the companies in their communities. CPAs have long been the trusted business advisers for their clients, providing services to meet a wide range of business needs. Their services might include not only audit, accounting and tax, but also information technology, strategic planning and business valuation, as well as personal financial planning, estate planning and general business consulting. For those reasons, companies have long turned to CPA firms to help them understand and address their most pressing business questions. And regional CPA firms don't simply deliver services, they provide the kinds of customized, hands-on advice and insights that their clients need to achieve their business goals.
Would you would like to learn more about all a regional CPA firm has to offer? If so, please contact:
McMahan and Associates, LLC
In order to properly prepare for the implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 54, “Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions” (“GASB54”), we are sending along this guidance and are requesting your help in a few key areas.
Implementation is required for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010. Therefore, counties, towns, cities and other local governments are required to implement for audits ending December 31, 2011. School districts and other local governments with a June 30th year-end are required to implement for their 2010-2011 fiscal year-end. Early implementation of GASB54 is permitted.
Because this new standard redefines what should be classified as a special revenue fund, we are asking each of our clients to assess all of their funds currently classified as such to ensure that they will still meet the definition. Definitions for debt service funds and capital projects funds largely remain the same, as does the General Fund.
Special revenue funds are “used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditure for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Specific revenue source should be the foundation for a special revenue fund.”
Therefore, in your assessment of each special revenue fund currently maintained, it may be that a particular fund does not meet this definition. If this should occur, there are currently two alternatives to select from: 1) close the fund up to the General Fund or 2) consolidate up to the General Fund for financial reporting purposes only.
Additionally, GASB54 lists out five new components of fund balance, which will completely replace the current components in use. These new components are as follows:
Non-spendable These will be easy to identify. They are amounts representing inventories, prepaid items, long-term portion of loans receivable, etc., as they are inherently non-spendable.
Restricted These amounts too, should be relatively easy to identify. These amounts represent TABOR reserve, Conservation Trust fund balances, Debt Service Fund balances and amounts subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions.
Committed A committed component of fund balance would have most likely been previously reported within unreserved, designated fund balance. They are resources whose use is constrained by a limitation that a government imposes upon itself at its highest decision making level (i.e., council/commissioners) and remains binding unless the constraint is removed in the same manner in which it was placed. For these items, please have the ordinance/ resolution/ approval available during fieldwork to determine the proper amount. As an example, previous unreserved designated fund balances that we feel would meet this category are “designated for housing loan programs”, “designated for encumbrances” (if governing approval required).
Assigned An assigned component of fund balance would have most likely been previously reported within unreserved, undesignated fund balance. This amount would reflect a government’s “intended use of the resource”. Therefore, remaining fund balances for capital projects and special revenue funds not constrained by the previous fund balance components would be reported here.
Unassigned If an amount does not fit any other component listed above, these amounts would be reported within this category but, usually only for the General Fund. This component may be reported in another governmental fund only if the fund is in a deficit situation.
We are asking each of our clients to review their current chart of accounts in order to update accounts used to currently track this information. Certain accounts may not be currently maintained within the chart of accounts (non-spendable); if this is the case, this data may only be captured within the drafted financial statements. For those instances, we will discuss during fieldwork whether it is necessary to add to the current chart of accounts or not.
As information, if any, arises that affects implementation, we will notify you as soon as possible. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns. During fieldwork, we will be spending some time to go over the specific needs of each of our clients.
Condominium associations, which may include property owner associations, and time-share or interval ownership associations, are responsible for maintaining and preserving the association’s common property.
Condominium associations, which may include property owner associations, and time-share or interval ownership associations, are responsible for maintaining and preserving the association’s common property.
Typically, associations are incorporated under state non-profit statutes, since these entities do not issue capital stock or have shareholders. That is, the net income or losses of the association do not flow to the owner/members. However, incorporation as a non-profit does not equate to exemption from income taxes, and all associations must file annual tax returns. Most associations will be required to file either Form 1120 (U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return) or Form 1120-H (U.S. Income Tax Return for Homeowner Associations).
An association filing Form 1120 would be subject to regular graduated corporate tax rates (beginning at 15% of the first $50,000 of taxable income) on its net taxable income. Taxable income is comprised of revenues earned from sources other than common assessments or from the provision of services for members/owners of the association (e.g., investment income, rentals, vending, or fees earned from parties other than the owner/members) reduced by expenses incurred in generating these revenues (e.g., investment account fees, management fees, professional fees, rental expenses, vending supplies, etc.).
Generally, time-share associations and associations which are considered “substantially residential” (based on IRS criteria) would file Form 1120-H. Note that the IRS’ definition of “substantially residential” incorporates an evaluation of the percentage of units participating in short-term rentals. Form 1120-H imposes a flat tax rate of 30% (32% for time-shares) on the association’s net taxable income, which is largely similar to the concept of taxable income discussed above.
Common misconceptions frequently encountered when discussing association income taxes include the following:
- “Our association reported a net income (loss) on our financial statements; therefore we will report the same amount as taxable income (loss) for the year.” Taxable income for an association is calculated differently than net income for financial statement purposes.
- “Income earned from investments held in the Replacement Fund isn’t taxable”. All interest income is considered taxable regardless of the fund in which it is reported.
- “Transferring Operating Fund net income to the Replacement Fund will minimize our association’s taxable liability.” Transfers between funds do not have a direct impact on the amount of income taxes paid by the association.
Recent IRS scrutiny of association income tax returns has resulted in numerous court rulings, revenue procedures, and amendments to the Internal Revenue Code. The tax professionals at McMahan and Associates work to ensure that your association’s tax return complies with applicable tax guidance, while minimizing your tax liability. If you have questions regarding your association’s specific tax situation, please don’t hesitate to contact us.
President Biden support extending the individual tax provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, many of which are set to expire next year, Department of the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said.
President Biden support extending the individual tax provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, many of which are set to expire next year, Department of the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said.
"The President has made it clear that he would oppose raising back the taxes for working people and families making under $400,000," Secretary Yellen testified before the Senate Finance Committee during a March 21, 2024, hearing to review the White House fiscal year 2025 budget proposal.
She then affirmed that "he would" support extending the individual tax provisions of the TCJA when asked by committee Ranking Member Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), who noted that the budget did not make any mention of this.
Yellen defended the fiscal 2025 budget request against assertions that taxes will indeed go up for those making under $400,000, contrary to President Biden’s promise, because the taxes that are targeted to wealthy corporations to ensure they are paying their fair share will ultimately be passed down to their consumers in the form of higher prices and lower wages.
"I think what the impact when you change taxes on corporations, what the impact is on families involves a lot of channels that are speculative," Yellen said. "They are included in models that sometimes the Treasury used for the purposes of analysis, in a tax that is levied on corporations, that has no obvious direct effect on households."
The proposed budget would increase the corporate minimum tax from the current 15 percent to 21 percent, as well as raise the tax rate on U.S. multinationals’ foreign earnings from the current 10.5 percent to 21 percent. The current corporate tax rate would climb to 28 percent and the budget would eliminate tax breaks for million-dollar executive compensation. It would also increase the tax rate on corporate stock buybacks from 1 percent to 4 percent, among other business-related tax provisions.
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
Corporations and billionaires will be paying more in taxes if Congress follows recommendations President Biden gave during his State of the Union address.
Corporations and billionaires will be paying more in taxes if Congress follows recommendations President Biden gave during his State of the Union address.
President Biden highlighted a number of initiatives during the March 7, 2024, address. For corporations, he said that it is "time to raise the corporate minimum tax to at least 21 percent."
"Remember in 2020, 55 of the biggest companies in America made $40 billion and paid zero in federal income taxes," President Biden said. "Zero. Not anymore. Thanks to the law I wrote [and] we signed, big companies have to pay minimum 15 percent. But that’s still less than working people paid federal taxes."
Additionally, he alluded to further recommendations that will likely be included when the administration released its budget proposal, expected as early as the week of March 11, 2024. This includes limiting tax breaks related to corporate and private jets and capping deductions on certain employees at $1 million.
For billionaires, President Biden is looking to increase their tax rate to 25 percent.
"You know what the average federal taxes for those billionaires [is]?" he asked. “"They’re making great sacrifices. 8.2 percent. That’s far less than the vast majority of Americans pay. No billionaire should pay a lower federal tax rate than a teacher or a sanitation worker or nurse."”
President Biden said this proposal would raise $500 billion over the next 10 years and suggested some of that additional tax money would help strengthen Social Security so that there would be no need to cut benefits or raise the retirement age to extend the life of the Social Security program.
The IRS has launched a new initiative to improve tax compliance among high-income taxpayers who have not filed federal income tax returns since 2017.
The IRS has launched a new initiative to improve tax compliance among high-income taxpayers who have not filed federal income tax returns since 2017. This effort, funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, involves sending out IRS compliance letters to over 125,000 cases where tax returns have not been filed since 2017. These mailings include more than 25,000 to individuals with incomes exceeding $1 million and over 100,000 to those with incomes ranging between $400,000 and $1 million for the tax years 2017 to 2021. The IRS will begin mailing these compliance alerts, formally known as the CP59 Notice, this week.
Recipients of these letters should act promptly to prevent further notices, increased penalties, and stronger enforcement actions. Consulting a tax professional can help them swiftly file late tax returns and settle outstanding taxes, interest, and penalties. The failure-to-file penalty is 5 percent per month, capped at 25 percent of the tax owed. Additional resources are available on the IRS website for non-filers.
The non-filer initiative is part of the IRS's broader campaign to ensure large corporations, partnerships, and high-income individuals fulfill their tax obligations. Non-respondents to the non-filer letter will face further notices and enforcement actions. If someone consistently ignores these notices, the IRS may file a substitute tax return on their behalf. However, it's still advisable for the individual to file their own return to claim eligible exemptions, credits, and deductions.
An individual’s claim for innocent spouse relief was rejected for lack of jurisdiction because the taxpayer failed to file his petition within the 90-day deadline under Code Sec. 6015(e)(1)(A).
An individual’s claim for innocent spouse relief was rejected for lack of jurisdiction because the taxpayer failed to file his petition within the 90-day deadline under Code Sec. 6015(e)(1)(A). The taxpayer argued that the deadline to file a petition for a denial of innocent spouse relief was not jurisdictional and asked that the Tax Court hear his case on equitable grounds. However, the Tax Court noted that a filing deadline is jurisdictional if Congress clearly states that it is. The IRS argued that argues that the 90-day filing deadline of Code Sec. 6015(e)(1)(A) was jurisdictional because Congress clearly stated that it was and the Supreme Court’s decision in Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner, 142 S. Ct. 1493, in addition to numerous appellate cases, supported this argument.
The Tax Court examined the "text, context, and relevant historical treatment" of the provision at issue and concluded that the 90-day filing deadline of Code Sec. 6015(e)(1)(A) was jurisdictional. On the basis of statutory interpretation principles, the jurisdictional parenthetical in Code Sec. 6015(e)(1)(A) was unambiguous. It did not contain any ambiguous terms and there was a clear link between the jurisdictional parenthetical and the filing deadline. Specifically, Code Sec. 6015(e)(1)(A) is a provision that solely sets forth deadlines. Further, it was unclear what weight, if any, should be given to the equitable nature of Code Sec. 6015. The statutory context arguments were not strong enough to overcome the statutory text. Accordingly, the Tax Court ruled that the 90-day filing deadline in Code Sec. 6015(e)(1)(A) was jurisdictional.
P.A. Frutiger, 162 TC —, No. 5, Dec. 62,432
The IRS has continued to increase the amount of information available in multiple languages. This was part of the IRS transformation work under the Strategic Operating Plan, made possible by additional resources provided by the Inflation Reduction Act (P.L. 117-169).
The IRS has continued to increase the amount of information available in multiple languages. This was part of the IRS transformation work under the Strategic Operating Plan, made possible by additional resources provided by the Inflation Reduction Act (P.L. 117-169). On IRS.gov, taxpayers can select their preferred language from the dropdown menu at the top of the page, including Spanish, Vietnamese, Russian, Korean, Haitian Creole, Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese. Additionally, the Languages page gives taxpayers information in 21 languages on key topics such as "Your Rights as a Taxpayer" and "Who Needs to File."
"The IRS is committed to making further improvements for taxpayers in a wide range of areas, including expanding options available to taxpayers in multiple languages," said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. "Understanding taxes can be challenging enough, so it’s important for the IRS to put a variety of information on IRS.gov and other materials into the language a taxpayer knows best. This is part of the larger effort by the IRS to make taxes easier for all taxpayers," he added.
If taxpayers cannot find the answers to their tax questions on IRS.gov, they can call the IRS or get in-person help at an IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center. Finally, hundreds of IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) and Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) programs have access to Over the Phone Interpreter services. VITA and TCE offer free basic tax return preparation to qualified individuals.
The IRS has granted to withholding agents an administrative exemption from the electronic filing requirements for Form 1042, Annual Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Source Income of Foreign Persons.
The IRS has granted to withholding agents an administrative exemption from the electronic filing requirements for Form 1042, Annual Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Source Income of Foreign Persons. Under the exemption:
- withholding agents (both U.S. and foreign persons) are not required to file Forms 1042 electronically during calendar year 2024; and
- withholding agents that are foreign persons are not required to file Forms 1042 electronically during calendar year 2025.
The exemption is automatic, so withholding agents do not need to file an electronic filing waiver request to use the exemption.
Electronic Filing of Form 1042
Under Code Sec. 6011(e), the IRS must prescribe regulations with standards for determining which federal tax returns must be filed electronically. In 2023, final regulations were published to implement amendments to Code Sec. 6011(e) that lowered the threshold number of returns for required electronic filing of certain returns. The regulations included requirements for filing Form 1042 electronically.
The final regulations provide that:
- a withholding agent (but not an individual, estate,or trust) must electronically file Form 1042 if the agent is required to file 10 or more returns of any type during the same calendar year in which Form 1042 is required to be filed;
- a withholding agent that is a partnership with more than 100 partners must electronically file Form 1042 regardless of the number of returns the partnership is required to file during the calendar year; and
- a withholding agent that is a financial institution must electronically file Form 1042 without regard to the number of returns it is required to file during the calendar year.
The final regulations apply to Forms 1042 required to be filed for tax years ending on or after December 31, 2023. This means that withholding agents must apply the new electronic filing requirements beginning with Forms 1042 due on or after March 15, 2024.
Challenges to Withholding Agents
Since the final regulations were published, the IRS received feedback from withholding agents noting challenges in transitioning to the procedures needed for filing Forms 1042 electronically. Withholding agents expressed concerns about the limited number of Approved IRS Modernized e-File Business Providers for Form 1042, and difficulties accessing the schema and business rules for filing Form 1042 electronically. Withholding agents that do not rely on modernized e-file business providers said that they needed more time to upgrade their systems for filing on the IRS’s Modernized e-File platform. Agents also noted challenges specific to foreign persons filing Forms 1042 regarding the authentication requirements necessary for accessing the platform.
In response to these concerns, the IRS used its power under the regulations to provide the exemption from the electronic filing requirement for Form 1042, in the interest of effective and efficient tax administration.
Despite the 16-day government shutdown in October, a number of important developments took place impacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, especially for individuals and businesses. The Small Business Health Option Program (SHOP) was temporarily delayed, Congress took a closer look at income verification for the Code Sec. 36B premium assistance tax credit, and held a hearing on the Affordable Care Act's employer mandate. Individuals trying to enroll in coverage through HealthCare.gov also experienced some technical problems in October.
Despite the 16-day government shutdown in October, a number of important developments took place impacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, especially for individuals and businesses. The Small Business Health Option Program (SHOP) was temporarily delayed, Congress took a closer look at income verification for the Code Sec. 36B premium assistance tax credit, and held a hearing on the Affordable Care Act's employer mandate. Individuals trying to enroll in coverage through HealthCare.gov also experienced some technical problems in October.
SHOP
The Affordable Care Act created two vehicles to deliver health insurance: Marketplaces for individuals and the SHOP for small businesses. Marketplaces launched as scheduled on October 1 in every state and the District of Columbia. Qualified individuals can enroll in a Marketplace to obtain health insurance. Coverage through a Marketplace will begin January 1, 2014.
The October 1 start of SHOP, however, was delayed. Small employers may start the application process on October 1, 2013 but all functions of SHOP will not be available until November, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reported. If employers and employees enroll by December 15, 2013, coverage will begin January 1, 2014, HHS explained.
SHOP is closely related to the Code Sec. 45R small employer health insurance tax credit. This tax credit is designed to help small employers offset the cost of providing health insurance to their employees. After 2013, small employers must participate in SHOP to take advantage of the Code Sec. 45R tax credit. For tax years beginning during or after 2014, the maximum Code Sec. 45R credit for an eligible small employer (other than a tax-exempt employer) is 50 percent of the employer's premium payments made on behalf of its employees under a qualifying arrangement for QHPs offered through a SHOP Marketplace. The maximum credit for tax-exempt employers for those years is 35 percent. Maximum and minimum credits are based upon the level of employee wages. If you have any questions about SHOP and the Code Sec. 45R credit, please contact our office.
Code Sec. 36B tax credit
Effective January 1, 2014, qualified individuals may be eligible for the Code Sec. 36B premium assistance tax credit to help pay for health coverage through a Marketplace. The credit is linked to household income in relation to the federal poverty line (FPL). Generally, taxpayers whose household income for the year is between 100 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty line for their family size may be eligible for the credit.
When taxpayers apply for coverage in a Marketplace, the Marketplace will estimate the amount of the Code Sec. 36B credit that the taxpayer may be able to claim for the tax year. Based upon the estimate made by the Marketplace, the individual can decide if he or she wants to have all, some, or none of the estimated credit paid in advance directly to the insurance company to be applied to monthly premiums. Taxpayers who do not opt for advance payment may claim the credit when they file their federal income tax return for the year.
The October 16 agreement to reopen the federal government directed HHS to certify to Congress that Marketplaces verify eligibility for the Code Sec. 36B credit. HHS must submit a report to Congress by January 1, 2014 on the procedures for verifying eligibility for the credit and follow-up with a report by July 1, 2014 on the effectiveness of its income verification procedures.
Employer mandate
The Affordable Care Act generally requires an applicable large employer to make an assessable payment (a penalty) if the employer fails to offer minimum essential health coverage and a number of other requirements are not met. The employer mandate was scheduled to take effect January 1, 2014. However, the Obama administration delayed it for an additional year, to 2015.
In October, the House Small Business Committee heard testimony on the definition of full-time employee status for purposes of the employer mandate. An applicable large employer for purposes of the employer mandate is an employer that employs at least 50 full-time employees or a combination of full-time and part-time employees that equals at least 50. A full-time employee with respect to any month is an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week.
Employers testifying before the GOP-chaired committee urged an increase in the 30-hour threshold. "Many small businesses simply cannot afford to provide coverage to employees who average 30 hours per week," the owner of a supermarket told the committee. "Business owners will have to make tough choices and many part-time employees will face reduced hours," he added. "Many franchise businesses are being turned upside down by the new costs, complexities and requirements of the law," another business owner told the committee.
Legislation (HR 2575) has been introduced in the House to repeal the 30-hour threshold for classification as a full-time equivalent employee for purposes of the employer mandate and to replace it with 40 hours. The bill has been referred to the House Ways and Means Committee.
HealthCare.gov
As has been widely reported, the individuals seeking to enroll in Marketplace coverage through HealthCare.gov experienced some online problems in October. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has undertaken a comprehensive review of HealthCare.gov. In the meantime, HHS reminded individuals that in-person assistance centers are open as are customer call centers.
Enrollment
The Affordable Care Act generally requires individuals to carry health insurance after 2013 or make a shared responsibility payment (also known as a penalty). For 2014, the penalty is $95 or the flat fee of one percent of taxable income, $325 in 2015 or the flat fee of two percent of taxable income, $695 in 2016 or 2.5 percent of taxable income (the $695 amount is indexed for inflation after 2016).
Open enrollment in the Affordable Care Act's Marketplaces began October 1, 2013 and runs through March 31, 2014. The enrollment period overlaps with the January 1, 2014 requirement to carry health insurance or make a shared responsibility payment. On social media, the Obama administration clarified that individuals who enroll in coverage through a Marketplace at anytime during the enrollment period will not be responsible for a penalty.
If you have any questions about these developments or the Affordable Care Act in general, please contact our office.
No, taxpayers may destroy the original hardcopy of books and records and the original computerized records detailing the expenses of a business if they use an electronic storage system.
Business often maintain their books and records by scanning hardcopies of their documents onto a computer hard drive, burning them onto compact disc, or saving them to a portable storage device. The IRS classifies records stored in this manner as an "electronic storage system." Businesses using an electronic storage system are considered to have fulfilled IRS records requirements for all taxpayers, should they meet certain requirements. And, they have the freedom to reduce the amount of paperwork their enterprise must manage.
Record-keeping requirements
Code Sec. 6001 requires all persons liable for tax to keep records as the IRS requires. In addition to persons liable for tax, those who file informational returns must file such returns and make use of their records to prove their gross income, deductions, credits, and other matters. For example, businesses must substantiate deductions for business expenses with appropriate records and they must file informational returns showing salaries and benefits paid to employees.
It is possible for businesses using an electronic storage system to satisfy these requirements under Code Sec. 6001. However, they must fulfill certain obligations.
Paperwork reduction
In addition, using an electronic storage system may allow businesses to destroy the original hardcopy of their books and records, as well as the original computerized records used to fulfill the record-keeping requirements of code Sec. 6001. To take advantage of this option, taxpayers must:
(1) Test their electronic storage system to establish that hardcopy and computerized books and records are being reproduced according to certain requirements, and
(2) Implement procedures to assure that its electronic storage system is compliant with IRS requirements into the future.
Our firm would be glad to work with you to meet the IRS's specifications, should you want to establish a computerized recordkeeping system for your business. The time spent now can be worth considerable time and money saved by a streamlined and organized system of receipts and records.
Q. I use my computer for both business and pleasure and I am confused about how much I can deduct. Also, how are PDAs such as Palm Pilots, etc. deducted for tax purposes?
A. Because computers and peripheral equipment are viewed as more susceptible than other business property to unwarranted deductions for personal use, they are subject to special scrutiny under the tax law. This scrutiny comes from their classification as "listed property," which limits the amount that may be deducted each year.
A computer as listed property only becomes an issue if it is not used exclusively in business. If a computer is used exclusively at the taxpayer's regular business establishment or in the taxpayer's principal trade or business, the listed property limitations don't apply at all.
Any computer that you use predominately for pleasure may not be written-off over its life nearly as quickly as exclusive-use computers. If your business usage does not meet the predominant use test, you are relegated to using a much slower depreciation method (the ADS, straight-line method) over the longer-ADS recovery period.
Your computer will meet the predominant use test for any tax year if its qualified business use is more than 50% of its total use. You must review your computer's usage and determine the percentage usage for each of its various uses (business, investment, and personal). When computing the predominant use test, any investment use of your computer cannot be considered as part of the percentage of qualified business use. However, you do use the combined total of business and investment use to figure your depreciation deduction for the property. It's up to you to prove business use to the IRS; the IRS does not need to prove personal use to reject your deductions.
In order to claim your computer expenses, you must meet the adequate records requirements by maintaining a "log" or other documentary evidence that sufficiently establishes the business/investment percentage claimed. The log should be similar to a log you would keep to track your auto expenses, indicating date, time of usage, business or nonbusiness, and business reason. Good documentation is always the key to success if your return is ever audited.
Finally, what about application of these rules to PDA's? The shorter the designated "life" of the property, the faster you can write-off its cost. Cell phones are generally considered 7-year property (the cost is depreciated over seven years). Computers are generally considered 5-year property, and computer-software normally is 3-year property. PDA's are generally classified as 5-year property, being considered wireless computers. If a PDA includes a cell phone feature, as long as that feature is not predominant and removable, it continues to fall under the 5-year property rule. Software that you may download to your PDA is 3-year property. Software that you buy already loaded into the PDA, however, is 5-year property. Monthly charges for a wireless service provider are deductible as paid each month, just as your business would deduct any phone or internet service bill.